Thursday, November 8, 2012

$100 Referral Bonus!



Looking for a Reward this Holiday Season???


Are you interested in receiving a $100 Gift Card of your choice? Refer a friend or family member to me and if their loan closes and funds, I'll send you a $100 gift card of your choice! If you're the one looking to refinance your house or purchase a new home, you'll receive the gift card!

Email or call me for more information!

www.caliberfunding.com/scox

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

What's best for financing home improvement?

With interest rates being at an all time low, have you considered taking out a home improvement loan? Below is an article from www.bankrate.com with answers on what questions you may have in regards to this type of loan. After reading the article, if you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (817) 456-1678.

Happy Wednesday!
Sarah Cox



 

 

 

 

 

What's best for financing home improvement?

Dear Dr. Don,
We need to make some updates and improvements to our home as well as undertake a few cosmetic enhancements that will add to its appeal and market value based on our location and comparable homes in our immediate area. We expect the cost for these enhancements to be approximately $60,000 and are wondering about financing.

We currently have a fixed-rate mortgage and a line of credit. The balance on the 4.95 percent fixed-rate mortgage is $21,000, and the monthly payment, including taxes, is $1,206. The line of credit is $200,000, has a rate of the prime minus 1.6 points (currently 1.65 percent), and the outstanding balance is $172,000. The draw period on the line expires in October 2017, at which time we must pay off the balance in 10 years.

The estimated market value for a home like ours is $575,000. We are financially stable. Our gross income is $6,600 per month. We both have credit scores of about 769. We have three children: one in the third year of college, one entering college in 2013 and one possibly entering college in 2015.
Our question is: Considering the current favorable interest rates on mortgages and refinance products as well as equity lines and loans, what would be the most cost-effective way for us to finance the $60,000 for our home improvement work? It seems every bank we ask has its own agenda to serve, and it's getting very complicated. We also find many bank loan officers are overwhelmed with requests and are impatient. We would appreciate your unbiased and straightforward feedback.

-- Jeanne & Tom


Dear Jeanne & Tom,
Even though you've done an excellent job in describing your situation, a solution isn't clear-cut. Your goal should be to minimize your total interest expense over a time period that allows you to pay off the loans while meeting your other financial goals. How you can do that depends in part on your lenders' willingness to work with you and your attitude toward interest rate risk.
I'm going to discuss the pros and cons of three options, along with some variations on these options:
  1. Ask the lender to increase your home equity line of credit to $235,000.
  2. Do a cash-out first mortgage refinancing.
  3. Pay off the first mortgage with the available balance on your home equity line and then finance the home improvements with a new home equity loan.
If you are able to increase the credit line to $235,000, you will have enough to take on the projects, you'll hold on to the low interest rate on the debt, and you shouldn't have to pay much, if any, in closing costs on the change to the loan. But the lender has to be willing to work with you. And note that you'll be hanging onto the risk that the line's interest rate could head higher in the future because it's based on the prime rate. You can manage that risk by aggressively paying down the loan balance.

A cash-out refinancing will pay off your existing first mortgage plus release money for your home improvements and repairs. The home equity line lender may have to agree to the refinancing. If it has to agree and won't, then you can look into refinancing both the first mortgage and the line of credit. The bad news is you will lose the low rate on your home equity line. You'll also pay the higher closing costs associated with a first mortgage. The good news is you will no longer face the interest rate risk on the line of credit, and you'll be locking in at near-historic low rates on mortgage loans.

Finally, you could look at taking out a home equity loan as a third mortgage. It's called a third mortgage because it's third in line to be paid in the case of foreclosure. It won't be a third for long because you'll pay off the first mortgage with the loan proceeds and have money to pay for your household projects. The closing costs should be minimal, but the interest rate will be higher than they are on your existing first mortgage. You'd take this approach if you wanted to hold on to the home equity line and if that lender won't sign off on the cash-out first mortgage refinancing.

It's difficult to come up with definitive solutions when you incorporate an adjustable-rate loan into the equation. You know your needs and comfort levels more than I could ever hope to. Which approaches are the lenders willing to discuss, and how willing are you to take on the risk of higher interest rates in the future to hold on to relatively low adjustable-rate debt over the next few years? Talk over these options with your lenders, and the best home improvement financing approach will rise to the surface like cream.


Read more: Whats Best For Financing Home Improvement? | Bankrate.com http://www.bankrate.com/finance/home-equity/best-financing-home-improvement.aspx#ixzz2BZFsmPJc




http://www.bankrate.com/finance/home-equity/best-financing-home-improvement.aspx


Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Obama vs. Romney: Which Tax Plan Works for you?



Happy Election Day!

If you are still on the fence in regards to choosing a candidate and when considering their economics point of view, the following article from Bank Rate is insightful and informative.

The two men vying to occupy the White House for the next four years say they want to reform our current complicated tax system. But until that can be achieved, President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are proposing tweaks to the existing tax code.
 
Both candidates offer the American electorate only general outlines of their major tax proposals.
The Obama campaign's tax website touches on broad concepts such as raising tax rates on higher-income individuals and closing loopholes on millionaires and billionaires. As for more specifics, the president has elaborated on tax changes he supports in his annual budgets and State of the Union addresses, as well as in the corporate tax reform proposal issued by the U.S. Treasury earlier this year.

Romney also lists on his campaign website some general tax changes he favors, such as income tax rate reductions and maintaining the current tax treatment of investments. But the Republican candidate's plan also is light on details.

Romney's selection of Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., to be the Republican vice presidential nominee raised some tax watchers' eyebrows. As House Budget Committee chairman, Ryan created a plan that calls for just two individual income tax rates (10 percent and 25 percent) and no investment taxes for anyone regardless of income. However, Romney says he, not the new vice presidential candidate, is in charge of the campaign's fiscal proposals.

And while Obama makes no apologies for wanting to collect more money from some taxpayers, Romney insists that any tax changes should be revenue-neutral, meaning that if some taxes are hiked, others should be lowered to counter the increase. The Romney camp, however, has not provided any detail about what tax deductions or credits it would target to achieve federal revenue neutrality.

Here's a look at Obama's and Romney's positions on major tax areas affecting individual and business taxpayers. Not surprisingly, the two men's tax plans generally reflect the differences between their two political parties.

Candidates' proposals for changes to current tax laws

Ordinary individual income tax rates
Current tax rates:
  • 33 percent
  • 35 percent
  • 25 percent
  • 28 percent
  • 10 percent
  • 15 percent
Barack Obama's tax proposalsMitt Romney's tax proposals
Six tax rates with top rate applied to adjusted gross income of $200,000 for individuals, $250,000 for families:
  • 10 percent
  • 15 percent
  • 25 percent
  • 28 percent
  • 36 percent
  • 39.6 percent
A 20 percent reduction of the current six tax rates. Romney is also considering itemized deductions to a certain dollar amount:
  • 8 percent
  • 12 percent
  • 20 percent
  • 22.4 percent
  • 26.4 percent
  • 28 percent
Interest, dividend, capital gains
Certain qualified dividends are currently taxed at capital gains rates, which are zero percent for taxpayers in the 10 percent and 15 percent tax brackets and 15 percent for all other taxpayers.
General interest earnings, i.e., on such investments as CDs, are taxed at ordinary tax rates.
Carried interest, i.e., the share of profits that private equity and hedge fund partners receive as compensation, is taxed at capital gains rates.
Barack Obama's tax proposalsMitt Romney's tax proposals
Increase capital gains tax rate to 20 percent on high-earners. Impose the so-called Buffett rule, i.e., a minimum 30 percent tax on high-earners.
Dividends taxed as ordinary income for individuals with adjusted gross income of $200,000 ($250,000 for married couples filing jointly).
Carried interest taxed as ordinary income.
Eliminate taxes on investment income for taxpayers with adjusted gross income of less than $200,000. Retain 15 percent tax on interest, dividends and capital gains for all other taxpayers.
Estate tax
Currently, estates worth up to $5.12 million are not taxed, with estates worth more than that taxed at 35 percent.
Barack Obama's tax proposalsMitt Romney's tax proposals
Exempt estates worth up to $3.5 million and increase estate tax rate to 45 percent.Repeal estate tax permanently. This would enable estates worth any amount to pass from one party to the next with no tax.
Alternative minimum tax (AMT)
Separate tax rates of 26 percent and 28 percent currently apply to certain taxpayers who make more than an excluded threshold amount.
Barack Obama's tax proposalsMitt Romney's tax proposals
Replace the AMT with the so-called Buffett rule, which would require people making more than $1 million a year to pay at least 30 percent of investment income in taxes.Repeal the AMT altogether.
Corporate tax rate
The corporate tax rate is 35 percent at the present time.
Barack Obama's tax proposalsMitt Romney's tax proposals
The proposed rate is 28 percent, except for manufacturers, which would face a 25 percent rate.The proposed rate is 25 percent.
International taxes
This is generally a worldwide system where all income, regardless of where earned, is taxed.
Barack Obama's tax proposalsMitt Romney's tax proposals
Institute a minimum tax on overseas profits and other international proposals.Institute a territorial system that would tax U.S.-source profits of multinational corporations but would exempt profits earned abroad.
Research and development (R&D)
There was a 20 percent credit for qualified R&D expenditures in excess of a base amount; a 14 percent simplified credit was available to eligible taxpayers. This R&D credit expired Dec. 31, 2011. It's expected to be renewed.
Barack Obama's tax proposalsMitt Romney's tax proposals
Reinstate the current business R&D credit that expired Dec. 31, 2011.Strengthen (no details provided) and make permanent an R&D credit.
Energy
A renewable electricity production tax credit for, in part, wind, solar, geothermal energy production is available, as is a variety of tax credits and deductions for oil and gas operations.
Barack Obama's tax proposalsMitt Romney's tax proposals
Make the tax credit for production of renewable electricity permanent and refundable. Eliminate tax preferences for fossil fuels.Streamline energy production permitting. Focus on traditional energy resources rather than green technologies that typically are too expensive to compete in the marketplace.
Note: Many of these provisions are set to expire at the end of 2012.